Wyoming to Consider Buying an Aircraft Carrier

tabby · Post by **tabby** » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:10 am

Wyoming to Consider Buying an Aircraft Carrier - Lowering the Bar

I love it!

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:53 am

tabby;1386893 wrote: Wyoming to Consider Buying an Aircraft Carrier - Lowering the Bar

I love it!

One day someone is going to explain politics to me in words of one syllable so that I can understand it. In the meantime I stand in awe before such lunacy.

Post by **LarsMac** » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:31 pm

:-3Given their lack of navigable ports, I think they should work on an air farce instead of a navy one.

Post by **spot** » Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:05 am

Good site that, tabby, I'd not seen it before.

The definitions of "imminent" (meaning in the future) and "due process" (meaning secret executive choice) in another article there is pretty neat: AG Sort of Explains When and Why the President Could Drop a Bomb on You - Lowering the Bar

tabby · Post by **tabby** » Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:46 am

spot;1386945 wrote: The definitions of "imminent" (meaning in the future) and "due process" (meaning secret executive choice) in another article there is pretty neat: AG Sort of Explains When and Why the President Could Drop a Bomb on You - Lowering the Bar

Isn't ambiguity a great thing? It reminds me of when we were kids and we'd invent new games and make up the rules as we went along!

tabby · Post by **tabby** » Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:46 am

LarsMac;1386932 wrote: :-3Given their lack of navigable ports, I think they should work on an air farce instead of a navy one.

Good one, LarsMac! Here's an update: UPDATE: Wyoming No Longer Considering Buying an Aircraft Carrier - Lowering the Bar