I'm not going to quote any of the below article:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... ror119.xml
'cos I'd really like comments after it's been read!
What do you think of allowing ""coerced testimony"?
Allow coerced testimony in trials?
-
Bill Sikes
- Posts: 5515
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:21 am
Allow coerced testimony in trials?
Considering the number of innocent people IN prison and the number of criminals who get walks, I have to say....the way things have been done to this point does not hold a drop of water or faith with me. So, change things. The "justice" system doesn't work now, so, do things to MAKE it work.
[FONT=Arial Black]I hope you cherish this sweet way of life, and I hope you know that it comes with a price.
~Darrel Worley~
[/FONT]
Bullet's trial was a farce. Can I get an AMEN?????
We won't be punished for our sins, but BY them.
~Darrel Worley~
[/FONT]
Bullet's trial was a farce. Can I get an AMEN?????
We won't be punished for our sins, but BY them.
Allow coerced testimony in trials?
Bill Sikes;521793 wrote: I'm not going to quote any of the below article:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... ror119.xml
'cos I'd really like comments after it's been read!
What do you think of allowing ""coerced testimony"?
Absolutely, totally and utterly wrong.
This is so open to abuse and manipulation that it is unbelievable that any government could possible propose it with any expectation that it would be accepted.
The only people who have used rules like these are police states who want convictions ahead of justice.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... ror119.xml
'cos I'd really like comments after it's been read!
What do you think of allowing ""coerced testimony"?
Absolutely, totally and utterly wrong.
This is so open to abuse and manipulation that it is unbelievable that any government could possible propose it with any expectation that it would be accepted.
The only people who have used rules like these are police states who want convictions ahead of justice.