Do we perceive it because it is meaningful? Yes!

[coberst]

Do we perceive it because it is meaningful? Yes!

How does the man with agnosia (loss of ability to perceive the familiar due to brain damage) manage on the street? Quoting such an individual “On the sidewalk all things are slim—those are people; in the middle of the street, everything is very noisy, bulky, tall—that can be buses, cars.”

Rudolf Arnheim says, regarding agnosia, that “Many people use their unimpaired sense of sight to no better advantage during much of the day.” How can this be true? I suspect it is true because many of us have such a very narrow range of familiar objects that have any meaning to us. Our narrow intellectual interests leave us with a very narrow world of reality because we perceive only what is meaningful.

Our emotions are one source of meaning. Occasionally, while walking in the woods, some movement in the underbrush will cause my blood to “run cold”. Was that a source of danger? I suspect that to most animals without the ability to create abstract concepts all perceptions are those induced by emotions (we also call them instincts). I can be alerted by a mouse darting across the floor well on the peripheral fringes of my vision while I am busy concentrating on something else because animals survive based upon their response to movement.

Humans, however, can create an abstract concept, which means that we can create a virtual world on top of the world directly created by Mother Nature. Mother Nature has prepared us through emotion to be very aware of movement pattern but Mother Nature has not prepared us for dealing with the world of abstract concepts.

We have placed into the hands of ordinary people the extraordinary power of technology; it is this virtual world, where technology is dominating and grave danger lurks, for which Mother Nature has not prepared us.

Quotes from Art and Visual Perception: A psychology of the Creative Eye Rudolf Arnheim

[luciferjohn]

if i understand correctly ,i agree, the human understanding of his/her world has been getting narrower over time, the "supernatural" was once a common place thing everyone seen and interacted with it now most people say its impossible

so they can no longer see or interact with it because they no longer find a need to, thats my thought anyway.

[coberst]

luciferjohn;1238807 wrote: if i understand correctly ,i agree, the human understanding of his/her world has been getting narrower over time, the "supernatural" was once a common place thing everyone seen and interacted with it now most people say its impossible

so they can no longer see or interact with it because they no longer find a need to, thats my thought anyway.




I would say that our comprehension of our mortality is the driving force for most of the things that we do. Humans first created soul which led to gods, which led to THE GOD, which led to religion, which led to the mess that we are now in.

[luciferjohn]

coberst;1238961 wrote: I would say that our comprehension of our mortality is the driving force for most of the things that we do. Humans first created soul which led to gods, which led to THE GOD, which led to religion, which led to the mess that we are now in.


i would agree , but as of late religions are being replaced with the sciences,and they dont state that there is an afterlife they say its done when its done, therefore if theres no afterlife then why do people need the supernatural? and that is where the lack of sight infiltrates the situation. i like these type of conversations.