Reported Post by LarsMac

Post by **LarsMac** » Sun Nov 27, 2016 12:21 pm

LarsMac has reported a post.

Reason:I thought y'all were going to get rid of this clown.

What's up with that?
Post: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden

Forum: General Religious Discussions

Assigned Moderators: N/A

Posted by: Gnostic Christian Bishop

Original Content: This is incontrovertible proof that God is evil. God does not live by his own golden rule.

God kills when he could just as easily cure. This is irrefutable.

This is a clear violation of the golden rule. The golden rule as articulated by Jesus.

God then is clearly evil.

Do you agree with Jesus that anyone who breaks the golden rule is evil?

Regards

DL

Post by **spot** » Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:59 pm

I asked him several times and got ignored.

He is now gone.

G#Gill · Post by **G#Gill** » Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:39 am

Can't say that I am sad that he has gone. However, with regard to this 'Reported Post', I'm not sure why it should have been taken to task, as I don't think it was anything but an opinion by this poster ! Or maybe I am wrong ?

Post by **spot** » Mon Nov 28, 2016 7:31 am

G#Gill;1503101 wrote: with regard to this 'Reported Post', I'm not sure why it should have been taken to taskIt could have said Happy Birthday Queen Mother, the content was immaterial. What was wrong is that he posted again on the public area without responding to repeated moderator requests, as in "I asked him several times and got ignored".

G#Gill · Post by **G#Gill** » Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:26 am

Don't know what you asked him, but it must have been quite important for you to bother with such as him !

Post by **spot** » Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:35 am

The chap was a lesson in what not to do.

tude dog · Post by **tude dog** » Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:56 pm

spot;1503106 wrote: The chap was a lesson in what not to do.

Speak your mind?

That post you have a problem with was probably the first on in a while I was tempted to respond to. The problem was I just didn't know how to phrase it.

Sad to see him go.

Post by **spot** » Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:18 pm

I had no problem with the content of the reported post. I had a problem with his refusal to discuss his copy/paste multi-site blitzing, and I'd warned him that his next post would be his last if he didn't answer my question. The banning was preceded by a moderator conference.

What I wrote two days ago in this thread, to the same effect, was:It could have said Happy Birthday Queen Mother, the content was immaterial. What was wrong is that he posted again on the public area without responding to repeated moderator requests, as in "I asked him several times and got ignored".