Clodhopper;1380547 wrote: Well, thanks for your time. Cheerio.


Your welcome.

<t>Clodhopper;1380541 wrote: Ooh! You sound a bit sarcastic! Why?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Was I being sarcastic? I guess if I sounded that way, it's because I am very passionate about giving God the glory for His creation!<br/>
<br/>
Clodhopper;1380541 wrote: My theory? Why should I have one at all about ...

Ahso!;1380461 wrote: I'm reminded of Dana Carvey's The Church Lady from SNL.

I borrowed the picture from:

SATAN


:wah:

<t>Clodhopper;1380522 wrote: Granted.<br/>
<br/>
Not necessarily. We know nothing about the time before Time. This is where you start to fall apart.<br/>
<br/>
From: Biogenesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Really, please tell us what your theory is about the time before time ...

<t>Ahso!;1380453 wrote: I thought you said you'd "studied" Evolutionary Theory, Shalom. However, you, like Pahu, know absolutely nothing about it. You've taken a mis-characterization of a thing and applied it to people who know better. IOW, your definition of Evolutionary Theory is the propagandized ...

<t>Evolutionists theorize that the above two formulas can enable everything about us to make itself - with the exception of man-made things, such as automobiles or buildings. Complicated things, such as wooden boxes with nails in them, require thought, intelligence, and careful workmanship. But ...

This is the evolutionary formula for making life:

Dirt + water + time = fantastic living creatures of all kinds!

This is the evolutionary formula for making a universe:

Nothing + nothing = two elements + time = 92 natural elements + time = all physical laws and a completely structured universe of galaxies, systems, stars, planets, and moons orbiting in perfect balance and order.

<t>Clodhopper;1380421 wrote: Shalom: So you are a medical nurse, or in the last stages of training to be one?<br/>
<br/>
And you do NOT accept the science on which medicine is based? Have I understood your position correctly?<br/>
<br/>
So do you just ignore the stupid stuff that disagrees with your ...

<r>Ahso!;1380385 wrote: Shalom will most likely side with the majority of those who he groups with, and once he finds out his opinion of what you post is in the minority he'll most likely change his mind. After all, it's doubtful he actually read any of it.<br/>
<br/>
It's only a sensible deduction ...

<r>Ahso!;1380378 wrote: Don't get too high on that. It's most likely only a matter of time before Shalom goes around the net and finds that even 99% of creationists consider what you post to be ridiculous.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
I must say your posts are sometimes quite odd. :-2 If you were looking to ...

<t>Hello there Pahu. May God bless you for your dedication in defending His awesome creation! I happened upon this discussion when I was researching for my anatomy and physiology homework. This week the discussion was on blood and the components of blood. I googled blood clotting, which IS ...